REVIEW

Outcomes

DEMO

An outcome on a closed file changes what discovery asks on the open docket. This is the compounding proof: each closed file makes the next scan ask a better question.

Closed fileHV-0901CLOSEDLicence Appeal Tribunal decision (synthetic)

Recorded outcome: 2026-06-10: A denial issued after the 10-business-day window did not stop the s. 38(11) consequence from the 11th business day.
What the firm had done: The firm had treated the late denial as valid for the gap.
Labelled: Synthetic decision for the room, not a real case
Record: REC-HV-0901-1, outcome slot filled
Written back: SABS-38-LATE v1.0, a discovery template, born in shadow SHADOW v1.0 SECONDARYFIRMCOUNSEL-CONFIRMS

Template question: “This denial arrived late. Has the file treated it as effective for the gap, and what is the s. 38(11) exposure from day 11?”

Before: SABS-38 looked only for a missing response

0open files asked whether a late denial was treated as effective

After: the write-back template, in shadow

3open benefits files now asked, computed by tonight's scan over 60 files; 7 documents firm-wide are not yet extracted

REVIEWHV-0682A late denial is treated as effective for the gapREC-HV-0682-8
REVIEWHV-0765A late denial is treated as effective for the gapREC-HV-0765-8
REVIEWHV-1120A late denial is treated as effective for the gapREC-HV-1120-8degraded: documents not yet extracted on this file

The template stays in shadow. It raises the question on each file; it cannot block, bind or stand as authority until a named partner promotes it on its shadow record.