A late denial is treated as effective for the gap
What was checked
- Rule
- A late denial treated as effective for the gap
- Instrument
- Statutory Accident Benefits Schedule, O. Reg. 34/10, s. 38(8), (11)
- Enforcement
- reference, routes to review or escalation
- Verification status
- SECONDARY Consequence from the 11th business dayFIRM Template conditionFIRM Business-day countingCOUNSEL-CONFIRMS Legislation Act roll-forward section
- Policy sources
What it rests on
| Input | Value | Basis | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment plan received by the insurer | 2026-02-14 | From a document | |
| Insurer's denial | 2026-03-08 | From a document | |
| File treated the denial as effective | yes | From a document |
Deterministic reasoning
- Received 2026-02-14; due 2026-03-02 (DATE-01).
- Denial 2026-03-08 is after the window.
- The file records the denial as effective. The question comes from a template written back from a closed file's recorded outcome; see the policy book.
The record's slots
- Confidence
- From a document
- Question
- This denial arrived late. Has the file treated it as effective for the gap, and what is the s. 38(11) exposure from day 11? (benefits clerk)
- Reviewer
- empty
- Tier
- SHADOW v1.0 May raise a question. Cannot block, bind or stand as authority (SHADOW-01).
- Outcome
- empty while the file is open
- Coverage
- 7 documents on file, all extracted
Evidence packFalcon
A one-page PDF a carrier or the Law Society could read, and a JSON file a machine can check. Built only from this record and its sources.
This record is in shadow. The pack says so: it raises a question and cannot stand as authority.