EVIDENCE Decision Provenance
Clock cannot be re-derived: no document dates the incident, stored date 2026-11-02
Signature state, as it actually isDEMO KEY ONLYNOT THIRD-PARTY VERIFIED
SIGNED WITHa demo keyNot a firm key. A third party cannot rely on it.
TRUST ROOTself-publishedThe hash can be recomputed by anyone; the signer cannot yet be proved.
THIRD-PARTY VERIFICATIONnoneNo outside party has checked this record.
Signed with a demo key. Trust root self-published. Third-party verification: none.
What was checked
- Rule
- Basic limitation period: two years from discovery
- Instrument
- Limitations Act, 2002, S.O. 2002, c. 24, Sch. B, s. 4
- Enforcement
- reference, routes to review or escalation
- Verification status
- SECONDARY Basic period, two years from discoverySECONDARY Discovery: knew or ought to have knownSECONDARY s. 5(2) presumptionCOUNSEL-CONFIRMS Clause numbering within s. 5(1)
- Policy sources
What it rests on
| Input | Value | Basis | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stored limitation date | 2026-11-02 | Client said | |
| Incident date | 2024-11-02 | Client said | |
| Statement of claim issued by prior counsel | Not on file | Missing | no document |
| Written tolling agreement (LIM-22) | Not on file | Missing | no document |
| File transfer letter from prior counsel | Not on file | Missing | no document |
Deterministic reasoning
- Incident dates on file: 2024-11-02 (client said).
- No document-backed date with a matching quote. The safe date cannot be found.
- LIM-22: no written agreement suspends or extends the period.
- The stored clock 2026-11-02 stays in force until a document re-derives it.
The record's slots
- Confidence
- Missing
- Question
- Which document dates the incident? (lawyer)Did prior counsel issue a statement of claim, and when? (lawyer)
- Reviewer
- empty
- Tier
- SHADOW v1.0 May raise a question. Cannot block, bind or stand as authority (SHADOW-01).
- Outcome
- empty while the file is open
- Coverage
- 3 documents on file, all extracted
Evidence packFalcon
A one-page PDF a carrier or the Law Society could read, and a JSON file a machine can check. Built only from this record and its sources.
This record is in shadow. The pack says so: it raises a question and cannot stand as authority.