Acceptance not confirmed in writing: due 2026-09-28

REC-HV-1471-5REVIEWEXCEPTIONSHADOW v1.0HV-1471

DEMO KEY ONLYNOT THIRD-PARTY VERIFIEDSigned with a demo key. Trust root self-published. Third-party verification: none.The demo key is not a firm key: a third party cannot rely on it.

What was checked

Rule: Confirm a material instruction in writing within 2 business days
Instrument: Hale & Voss LLP (fictional) client instructions policy, Material instructions
Enforcement: reference, routes to review or escalation
Verification status: FIRM Firm ruleFIRM Business-day countingCOUNSEL-CONFIRMS Legislation Act roll-forward sectionCOUNSEL-CONFIRMS Seeded holiday calendar, 2024 to 2031
Policy sources

What it rests on

Input	Value	Basis	Source
Client's instruction to accept	2026-09-24	From a document
Offer	$85,000 inclusive, open until 2026-10-08	From a document
Written confirmation to the client	Not on file	Missing	no document

Deterministic reasoningno model sits here, by design

Instruction 2026-09-24 (Telephone attendance note).
Two business days (DATE-01): due 2026-09-28.
No written confirmation on file at 2026-10-05.

The record's slots

Confidence: From a document
Question: Has the client's acceptance been confirmed to them in writing? (lawyer)
Reviewer: empty
Tier: SHADOW v1.0 May raise a question. Cannot block, bind or stand as authority (SHADOW-01).
Outcome: empty while the file is open
Coverage: 5 documents on file, all extracted

Evidence packFalcon

A one-page PDF a carrier or the Law Society could read, and a JSON file a machine can check. Built only from this record and its sources.

This record is in shadow. The pack says so: it raises a question and cannot stand as authority.