Two sources disagree: how the collision happened

REC-HV-1044-9REVIEWEXCEPTIONSHADOW v1.0HV-1044

DEMO KEY ONLYNOT THIRD-PARTY VERIFIEDSigned with a demo key. Trust root self-published. Third-party verification: none.The demo key is not a firm key: a third party cannot rely on it.

What was checked

Rule: Every fact carries its source quote; a contradiction is a finding
Instrument: Hale & Voss LLP (fictional) verified case record policy, Source quotes and contradictions
Enforcement: reference, routes to review or escalation
Verification status: FIRM Firm rule
Policy sources

What it rests on

Input	Value	Basis	Source
How the collision happened	Struck while turning left	From a document
How the collision happened	Rear-ended while stopped at a red light	Client said

Deterministic reasoningno model sits here, by design

Two sources state the how the collision happened differently.
The contradiction is a finding, with both quotes side by side.

The record's slots

Confidence: Client said
Question: Which account will the client's statement adopt? (lawyer)
Reviewer: empty
Tier: SHADOW v1.0 May raise a question. Cannot block, bind or stand as authority (SHADOW-01).
Outcome: empty while the file is open
Coverage: 6 documents on file, all extracted

Evidence packFalcon

A one-page PDF a carrier or the Law Society could read, and a JSON file a machine can check. Built only from this record and its sources.

This record is in shadow. The pack says so: it raises a question and cannot stand as authority.