Passenger JD is adverse to our client and must be referred out

REC-HV-1044-8REVIEWEXCEPTIONSHADOW v1.0HV-1044

DEMO KEY ONLYNOT THIRD-PARTY VERIFIEDSigned with a demo key. Trust root self-published. Third-party verification: none.The demo key is not a firm key: a third party cannot rely on it.

What was checked

Rule: Refer an adverse person out in writing, with their safe date
Instrument: Rules of Professional Conduct 3.4; Hale & Voss LLP (fictional) referral policy, 3.4; firm referral policy
Enforcement: reference, routes to review or escalation
Verification status: SECONDARY Conflict principleFIRM Referral letter content
Policy sources

What it rests on

Input	Value	Basis	Source
Passenger's safe date	2028-03-06	From a document
Passenger date of birth	2009-08-12	Client said
Passenger age at the collision	16	From a document
Passenger adverse to the client	yes	Inferred, needs counsel
Referral letter sent to her parent	Not on file	Missing	no document

Deterministic reasoningno model sits here, by design

A passenger in the client's vehicle is adverse to the client as driver.
The passenger's safe date is the earliest document-supported date plus two years: 2028-03-06.
She is a minor: RCP-7 requires a litigation guardian to sue. The letter says so.
LIM-06 minority suspension appears only as a fork for her counsel, never as a later date in the letter.
The letter is queued, not sent. No advice on the merits.

The record's slots

Confidence: Client said
Question: Has the referral letter gone to her parent, and which document confirms her date of birth? (lawyer)
Reviewer: empty
Tier: SHADOW v1.0 May raise a question. Cannot block, bind or stand as authority (SHADOW-01).
Outcome: empty while the file is open
Coverage: 6 documents on file, all extracted

Evidence packFalcon

A one-page PDF a carrier or the Law Society could read, and a JSON file a machine can check. Built only from this record and its sources.

This record is in shadow. The pack says so: it raises a question and cannot stand as authority.