OVERTURE PIHale & Voss LLPDEMO
SOVEREIGNSHADOWHV-PB 2026.10

A later discovery date is an argument for counsel, not the clock

REC-HV-1044-4REVIEWCANNOT DETERMINESHADOW v1.0HV-1044
DEMO KEY ONLYNOT THIRD-PARTY VERIFIEDSigned with a demo key. Trust root self-published. Third-party verification: none.The demo key is not a firm key: a third party cannot rely on it.
What was checked
Rule
Discovery: knew or ought to have known
Instrument
Limitations Act, 2002, S.O. 2002, c. 24, Sch. B, s. 5
Enforcement
reference, routes to review or escalation
Verification status
SECONDARY Discovery: knew or ought to have knownSECONDARY s. 5(2) presumptionCOUNSEL-CONFIRMS Clause numbering within s. 5(1)
Policy sources
What it rests on
InputValueBasisSource
Incident date2026-03-06From a document
Injury first recorded2026-04-17From a document
Deterministic reasoningno model sits here, by design
  1. Safe date 2026-03-06 from a document; the clock is 2028-03-06.
  2. A later document (2026-04-17) first records the injury.
  3. LIM-05 records this as a fork for counsel. The safe date leads; the clock does not move.
The record's slots
Confidence
Inferred, needs counsel
Question
Will counsel argue discoverability from 2026-04-17, and on which evidence? (lawyer)
Reviewer
empty
Tier
SHADOW v1.0 May raise a question. Cannot block, bind or stand as authority (SHADOW-01).
Outcome
empty while the file is open
Coverage
6 documents on file, all extracted
Evidence packFalcon

A one-page PDF a carrier or the Law Society could read, and a JSON file a machine can check. Built only from this record and its sources.

This record is in shadow. The pack says so: it raises a question and cannot stand as authority.